|
In
this experiment we will be exploring the power of bernoullis equations
you
can see how to follow the procedure (set up) in the lab manual.
Here
is the values for the constants that we will use
Here
are the times obtained and the uncertainty calculation is on the bottom
|
|
1st
Run
|
2nd
Run
|
3rd
Run
|
4th
Run
|
5th
Run
|
6th
Run
|
Avg
time
|
12.04
|
11.58
|
11.76
|
11.54
|
11.19
|
10.81
|
11.48666667
|
subtract
the average from each run
|
||||||
0.553333333
|
0.093333333
|
0.27333333
|
0.053333333
|
-0.2966667
|
-0.67666667
|
avg
uncertainty
|
0.324444444
|
||||||
11.48-.32
<TRUE VALUE< 11.48+.32or
Here are the constants measured with their corresponding uncertainty
|
||||||
here is the calculation in order to find the theoretical time. the procedure of how to add the uncertainty is also shown.
theoretical value
7.94< 8.98 < 10.02
comparing the theoretical time with the time that we took. it is easy to see that our times do not fall under the allowed uncertainity by a couple of seconds
calculated value
11.16
< true value < 11.8
theoretical value
7.94< 8.98 < 10.02
answer in finding the diameter of the hole with the error percent .
4.5 cm<True measured value < 5.5 c.40 .40cm <True calculated value<.49
sumarizing this experiment. we can coclude 2 things.the first conclusion is to recognize the authenticity of Bernoulli’s
equations. The other conclusion is to say that small percent error can lead to
huge different answers.




No comments:
Post a Comment